Should we ve urine testing for Welfare applicants 46012

2019年9月16日 (月) 15:07時点におけるJanisBurt0 (トーク | 投稿記録)による版 (ページの作成:「Like plenty of people in america, I've a job. I perform, they pay me. I pay my taxes and my taxes are distributed by the government as they see fit. Be taught further abo...」)

(差分) ←前の版 | 最新版 (差分) | 次の版→ (差分)
移動: 案内検索

Like plenty of people in america, I've a job. I perform, they pay me. I pay my taxes and my taxes are distributed by the government as they see fit. Be taught further about by browsing our provocative website. In order to get that paycheck, I am required to pass a urine test, which I have no problem with. And the primary reason I have not a problem with a drug test is because I have nothing to hide. What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my fees to people who are doing drugs and never have to go a urine test. To check up more, please consider checking out: home page.

Because I have to pass one to make it for them, shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check?

Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. Get new resources about Understanding Alcohol And Drug Rehabilitation - stoutmyers76alhxzv by browsing our novel wiki. I actually do, on another hand, have a problem with supporting somebody sit on their bottom. Can you imagine if people had to move a urine test to acquire a public assistance check the amount of money the state could save your self?

A 1999 Michigan law called for a pilot program of arbitrary substance abuse testing in at least three counties. Drug testing started at the start of October in Alpena, Presque Isle, and Berrien counties and a given part of Western Wayne County, including some of Detroit's west side neighborhoods.

All the new applicants for that region needed to provide a urine sample to officers or quit their to any government assistance. Furthermore, any individuals already inside the process had to submit to random testing.

A class-action suit was filed by the Michigan chapter of the ACLU two days prior to schedule testing. The suit charges that the program violates the constitutional rights of welfare recipients. Two Michigan mothers and a Detroit business (The Westside Mothers) were named in the suit. The business centers on addressing countless welfare recipients and their loved ones. Kary Moss, executive director of the ACLU in Michigan states, "The Fourth Amendment guarantees that no individual in this country might be subjected to a search by the us government unless there's reasonable suspicion that they have committed some crime, welfare recipients might be poor, but that's not a not yet, anyway."

I've spoken to quite a few people in person and on boards about their thoughts and the ones that oppose this have exactly the same posture, that it is unconstitutional. In my opinion, it would appear that I'm not driving random drug test onto any random citizen. The welfare recipient decides to get help from the government. Therefore exactly like distributing paperwork, you have to send a urine test. Another posture people talk about is false positives. Well when they maintain false positive, then execute a hair follicle test.

If urine check are unconstitutional, then discard the whole welfare system. Let your voice be heard on Political

If you loved this report and you would like to obtain far more information relating to kindly stop by the web site.